Entertainment
Bridgerton Season 4 Update: Benedict’s Increasing Exploration Of His Sexuality
Actor Luke Thompson, who portrays Benedict Bridgerton, has also verified that his character is pansexual in contemporary terms.
Bridgerton overseer Jess Brownell has confirmed that Benedict will keep delving into his “sexual fluidity” in season 4.
Numerous Bridgerton enthusiasts have long believed Benedict to be associated with the LGBTQ+ community. In season 3 part 2, he acts on same-sex inclinations for the first time. Benedict and Paul Suarez share a spark after Lady Tilly Arnold invites Benedict to engage in a threesome with Paul. Initially hesitant, Benedict eventually accepts and discovers his enjoyment in exploring his sexuality.
So, what implications does this hold for Benedict’s future narrative and where does his forthcoming romantic interest from the novels, Sophie Beckett, come into play? Well, showrunner Jess Brownell and Luke Thompson have disclosed the upcoming developments in Benedict’s journey as he assumes the spotlight in season 4.
Devotees of the books are already aware that Benedict weds a character named Sophie Beckett in his literary world, and judging by the synopsis for season 4, it seems that the series will retain her as a female character.
Jess hinted at Benedict’s future by stating: “I anticipate that we will prolong that narrative thread of his exploring his fluidity in the future. This marks not the conclusion of that journey. Regarding Sophie, I am unable to disclose when she will make her entrance yet.”
With this forethought, it appears probable that Benedict will encounter more male romantic interests in season 4 prior to uniting with Sophie.
Expressing his views on Benedict with Bustle, performer Luke Thompson mentioned: “He appears to approach his sentiments with an inquisitive demeanor. There is minimal turmoil involved. It’s gratifying to observe someone address that aspect of themselves devoid of apprehensions regarding their identity and its implications. The examination of male sexuality, specifically, can seem confining in its portrayal.”
Luke elaborated: “Let’s be clear, that era was exceedingly restrictive. Using present-day terminology, the closest resemblance would probably be along the lines of pansexuality – being captivated by an individual’s intellect and emotions, irrespective of their gender. That’s a suitable descriptor.”
He concluded by stating: “Nevertheless, what’s truly refreshing about this, especially in the ongoing discovery process, is the absence of definitive labels.”
